|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My family and I wish to commend the staff at A .Armstrong Consulting, as Federal Sentencing Consultants, they rendered invaluable assistance to my daughter acting pro se in identifying issues ripe for redress in a 2255 petition. With the Review, Research and preparation of the Motions she was able to prevail at the District Court level, obtaining a reduction from 180 months to 60 months. U.S. v L. Kelly, Dublin, CA. We retained A. Armstrong Consulting to review my husband's case for appeal. They were able to identify issues to raise on Appeal after Counsel had filed an Anders Brief. Further research by them provided Substantive Case Law to support the issues identified. After preparation of the Brief, and presentation to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals , his sentence was Vacated and Remanded to the District Court for Resentencing. I can't say enough about the quality of their services. LeAnn Stockwell. United States v. Stockwell, Western District Texas
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
HOME | ABOUT US | MITIGATION | PRE CUSTODY COUNSELING | POST SENTENCING |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
vincit qui patitur |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Site Map |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||